Le 27/01/2022 à 17:33, pierre amadio a écrit :
Fixing this for the OSHB module should be trivial.
Let me know if you want me to do it.
You mean directly on OSHB? This is a possibility. All module "just" add a zero in the good place...

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 17:20, Fr Cyrille<fr.cyri...@tiberiade.be>  wrote:


Le 27/01/2022 à 15:07, David Haslam a écrit :

What Karl has observed is a long-standing problem.

Might it be feasible to employ a suitable regular expression to match the 
Strong’s H number whether or not it has any leading zero[s]?

This would have to be done under the hood for this type of search, as it’s 
quite a different task than a user entered regex search.

But should such a workaround be better implemented in the SWORD API rather than 
as a kludge in a front-end?

And if so, how should JSword based front-ends also address the issue?


AndBible reads very well the Strong hebrew numbers.


David

Sent from ProtonMail for iOS


On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 13:27, Karl Kleinpaste<k...@kleinpaste.org>  wrote:

I have a Xiphos bug in which the facility to take a Strong's dict entry and 
search the Bible module for all its occurrences sometimes works and sometimes 
doesn't.

The mechanism is straightforward: Take the key from the dict pane, note whether 
this is Heb or Grk, construct e.g. lemma:Hxxxxx, stuff that into the sidebar 
search, and execute the search. No sweat.

The problem is with Heb refs. Because of the ancient habit that Heb Strong's refs are 
given a leading zero prefix (e.g. "07225") as a weak discriminant from Grk refs 
in the same number space, I actually handle this case explicitly. Strong's module keys 
are fixed, 5-digit strings, and the dict pane always shows this. When that key is taken 
to build the lemma search, I specifically include the last leading zero in the Heb case.

This works in KJV and ESV where we find "<w savlm="strong:H07225">In the 
beginning</w>".
This fails in NASB and OSHB where we find "<w savlm="strong:H7225">In the 
beginning</w>".
Note H07225 vs H7225.

The question revolves around what a Strong's ref ontologically is. Seriously, 
what is it?
Is it a number, written naturally with minimal required digits, stored for 
convenience in a character string?
Or is it a specific and fixed string of characters?

In terms of module keys, it's a string of characters.
In terms of Bible markup, well... Opinion varies. As we see in this case, some Bibles encode as a natural number, 
occupying the normal (minimal) digits needed, but others take the fixed string approach so as to include a leading 
zero, but note that it's not a full, fixed, 5-digit string to match a dict key; it's just one leading zero, no matter 
how many natural digits follow. KJV encodes the 1st Heb ref as "01". Not "1" (natural number) and 
not "00001" (module key); just "01".

Result is that, by constructing zero-prefixed searches, such searches always 
fail in Bibles using natural/minimal digits because there's never a 
zero-prefixed match.

This is different from Grk refs, which are stored in dict modules the same as 
Heb dict keys -- fixed 5-digit -- but are always marked up as natural numbers 
using minimal digits.

As matters stand, I have no a priori means by which to determine what to expect in a 
Bible's Heb Strong's markup. The dict pane's key from which to construct the search is 
fixed 5 digits. That is at first trimmed to natural, minimal digits...and then the 
trouble starts because I don't have anything like a module conf directive to tell me 
whether the module uses zero-prefixed Heb refs or not. I'm also not aware that we have 
any standard for such markup to which I can point to say, "NASB's markup is wrong 
because it lacks zero-prefixing on Heb refs."

Help.


_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list:sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page


_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list:sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list:sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Reply via email to