Yeah, the phone number itself is not metadata. The number of digits and how
they are organized would be some metadata about a phone number.
Other examples of metadata are a database schema, the bitrate of an mp3, or
the exposure used to capture a digital image.
Steve
On 4/22/07, Far McKon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm somewhat confused by this metadata discussion.
> >
> > Wouldn't things like phone numbers be considered data rather than
> > metadata?
>
> As Brian mentioned, metadata is information about information. As it
> relates to sycamore, metadata is information about a wiki page (or the
> real-world object that is represented as a wiki page).
Hmm. I don't agree with that explanation (no offense Scott). Here is
another take.
The text "(530)753-8639" on the page "Delta of Venus" is information.
You as a human can link that set of information to the category "Phone
Number." The fact that that is in the category "Phone Numbers" is
metdata and it's done by simian brain magic . So, for editing the
wiki, metadata is adding that link so machines can make that same
connection.
So, the phone number itself "(530)753-8639" is data. The extra bits
[[Metadata("phone:=(530)753-8639")]] let some machine, or other tool
look at that data, and safely assume it's a phone number,
> I do predict some very complex queries emerging that would get messy
> enough to warrant a special query-building interface.
I predict, and fear that. But that shouldn't stop anyone, it should
make a good challenge out of it!
- Far
_______________________________________________
Sycamore-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.projectsycamore.org/
https://tools.cernio.com/mailman/listinfo/sycamore-dev
_______________________________________________
Sycamore-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.projectsycamore.org/
https://tools.cernio.com/mailman/listinfo/sycamore-dev
