Though I appreciate the idea that a project should eat its own dogfood, I think having all the development info for sycamore in trac makes good sense, because having it in one place makes it easier for new contributors to get a full picture of the project.
On 5/21/07, Adam Dewitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know we have an awesome wiki to use for discussion at > ProjectSycamore.org, but perhaps we should start using the TRAC Wiki > to facilitate communication among developers. This keeps all the > development stuff in one place. > > We can use the ProjectSycamore.org for general project information > and documentation. > > Thoughts? > > AD > > > > > On May 21, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Rottenchester wrote: > > This sounds good - I'm still learning about trac. Is there a way to > integrate the discussion with the ticket so that all the information > about a particular feature is captured? Perhaps a wiki page for the > ticket? > > _______________________________________________ > Sycamore-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.projectsycamore.org/ > https://tools.cernio.com/mailman/listinfo/sycamore-dev > _______________________________________________ Sycamore-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.projectsycamore.org/ https://tools.cernio.com/mailman/listinfo/sycamore-dev
