The fact that some people actually took your email seriously could mean one
of two things: (1) they're not terribly bright; (2) the academic situation
(vis-à-vis branding, efficiency, marketing, targets, etc.) has gone very bad
indeed. I'm not sure which I'd prefer!

D


On 1/04/10 2:40 PM, "David Braddon-Mitchell" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear All
> 
> Before you choose to contribute to the ongoing discussion about the seminar
> reforms as many have chosen to do (sometimes expressing their views in very
> strong terms) I suggest you begin reflection by considering how each paragraph
> of that posting begins.
> 
> cheers
> d
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SydPhil mailing list: http://sydphil.info
> 
> 939 subscribers now served.
> 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, change your MEMBERSHIP OPTIONS, find ANSWERS TO COMMON
> PROBLEMS, or visit our ONLINE ARCHIVES, please go to the LIST INFORMATION
> PAGE: http://sydphil.info

_______________________________________________
SydPhil mailing list: http://sydphil.info

939 subscribers now served.

To UNSUBSCRIBE, change your MEMBERSHIP OPTIONS, find ANSWERS TO COMMON 
PROBLEMS, or visit our ONLINE ARCHIVES, please go to the LIST INFORMATION PAGE: 
http://sydphil.info

Reply via email to