Dear All,

The following item may be of interest:

Deleuze and Creativity2011-03-05, 1pm-3pm
Serial Space 33 Wellington St Chippendale
http://serialspace.org/archives/deleuze-and-creativity/

[image: 
deleuzeandcreativity]<http://serialspace.org/archives/deleuze-and-creativity/deleuzeandcreativity/>


Deleuze and Creativity

March 5th 1pm- 3pm

Confirmed speakers: Dr Robert Sinnerbrink (Macquarie University), Dr
Alexandre Lefebvre (University of Sydney) and Dr Mark Seton (AFTRS).


*Serial | In | Theory is an open-model series of symposia that aim to
provide settings for loose critical engagement. The program’s areas of focus
include proliferating praxis, philosophy of aesthetics and radical
interpretations of texts.***

*
*

The next Serial | in | Theory symposium will focus on Gilles Deleuze,
arguably the most creative philosopher of the 20th Century. Specifically we
will spend time examining Deleuze’s writing as it contributes to creative
thinking and practice. The presentations will cover questions of cinematic
thinking, production of the new and concepts pertinent to creative practice
such as ‘lines of flight’ and ‘the refrain’. It does not matter whether you
are an early or well versed reader, whether you have an interest in a
specific idea or a particular book, the symposia program is designed to be
inclusive and open to diverse approaches.

*
*

*
*

*PRESENTATION ABSTRACTS*

*Deleuze’s Cinematic Thinking*

Deleuze’s two *Cinema* books have had a profound impact on the study and
theorisation of film. Although Deleuze insists that he is doing philosophy
(rather than film theory) and creating concepts specific to film (rather
than doing “philosophy of film”), the question remains as to how film and
philosophy are related in his work. Both film and philosophy are forms of
thought; the intersection between them involves a creative dissonance
between concept and image. How, then, is philosophy transformed in this
encounter with film? Instead of offering yet another dutiful analysis of
Deleuze’s texts, I shall explore this question by staging an encounter
between Deleuze’s philosophy and David Lynch’s recent film, *INLAND EMPIRE*.
Lynch’s film engages in a “cinematic thinking” that is remarkably resonant
with Deleuze’s thought, and can even be described as an enigmatic case of
“film as philosophy”. The aim of my talk will thus be to show how film and
(Deleuzian) philosophy can work together in a mutually transformative
encounter.


*Robert Sinnerbrink* is Lecturer in Philosophy at Macquarie University. He
is the author of *New Philosophies of Film: Thinking Images* (Continuum
2011), and has published numerous articles on the film-philosophy
relationship, including philosophical studies of films by David Lynch,
Terrence Malick, and Lars von Trier.

*Judgment and Creativity*

One way to put the negative thrust of Deleuze’s philosophy is that he is
against judgment. Why? – Because for him judgment kills creativity, perhaps
nowhere more so than in art. It does so in two ways. On the one hand, the
purpose of judgment is to classify the new under the known. Hence, Deleuze’s
well known aversion to criticism and conversation, which do just that. And,
on the other hand, art can be, and most often is, produced with an eye to
facilitating smooth automatic judgments on the part of its audience. Think
here of Hollywood movies, classical and contemporary, that Deleuze discusses
in *Cinema 1*. I propose to use Deleuze’s critique of judgment to cut
directly to how he conceives of creativity. I will also attempt to develop a
positive concept of judgment from Deleuze, one that avoids the failings he
identifies. The hope is that Deleuze can help us to see critical and
creative powers internal to judgment.

*Alexandre Lefebvre* lectures in political philosophy at the University of
Sydney. He is author of *The Image of Law: Deleuze, Bergson, Spinoza* (Stanford
University Press, 2008) and co-editor of *Bergson, Politics, and
Religion* (Duke
University Press, 2011).

**

*When creative innovation emerges, will we recognise it?*

The inherent dilemma in our desire to recognise what is new or innovative is
that to ‘recognise’ something becomes the first step towards containing,
limiting and securing it as tangible and exploitable. For Deleuze, embodied
experiences are constantly *territorialised* in order that those experiences
may be perceived and recognised. Much innovation is already at work
impacting on our lives before it is ‘officially’ recognised. Prof Ralph
Stacey (2003) and his associates at the Complexity and Management Centre, in
the University of Hertfordshire (UK) through their consideration of *complex
responsive processes* suggest that we are involved in constantly re-making
and re-membering creative interactions with and for each other – a
rhizomatic process. The paradox of creative risk-taking and controlling, at
the same time, is inherent in the emergence of any likely innovation. Our
intentional participation in such a paradox of complex responsive processes
may enable us to more consciously engage with Deleuze’s ‘lines of flight’.


*Mark Seton* is the Dean of Education, Australian Film Television and Radio
School and is convenor of its innovative Graduate Certificate in Teaching
Creative Practice. He is an Honorary Research Associate of the Department of
Performance Studies, University of Sydney. He is also the Chair of the
Health Promotion subcommittee of the Australian Society for Performing Arts
Healthcare (ASPAH)

For more information please email Marian at [email protected]

-- 
Marian Tubbs

Co-director : serialspace.org

http://serialspace.org/archives/deleuze-and-creativity/

http://maps.google.com.au/maps?q=33+wellington+st+chippendale&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=33+Wellington+St,+Chippendale+New+South+Wales+2008&gl=au&t=h&z=16





-- 
Dr Robert Sinnerbrink
Lecturer, Department of Philosophy
Building W6A, Balaclava Rd
Macquarie University
North Ryde NSW 2109
Sydney, Australia
email: [email protected]
Tel: +612 9850 9935
Fax: +612 9850 8892
www.phil.mq.edu.au/staff/sinnerbrink.htm
http://mq.academia.edu/RobertSinnerbrink
Communications Officer, Australasian Society for Continental Philosophy
http://www.ascp.org.au/
_______________________________________________
SydPhil mailing list: http://sydphil.info

971 subscribers now served.

To UNSUBSCRIBE, change your MEMBERSHIP OPTIONS, find ANSWERS TO COMMON 
PROBLEMS, or visit our ONLINE ARCHIVES, please go to the LIST INFORMATION PAGE: 
http://sydphil.info

Reply via email to