BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20130618T050000Z
DTEND:20130618T063000Z
DTSTAMP:20130611T115955Z
ORGANIZER;CN=Postgraduate Events:mailto:[email protected]
 lendar.google.com
UID:[email protected]
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=
 TRUE;CN=Postgraduate Events;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:2beroskvjr2g24rjntqlqegs6
 [email protected]
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=
 TRUE;[email protected];X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:[email protected]
 u.au
CREATED:20130611T115954Z
DESCRIPTION:USyd Postgrad Work in Progress Talk: Johann Harriman\n\nTitle: 
 Causal Role Changing and the Unknowability of Fundamental Properties: Asses
 sing Lewis and Langton\n \nRae Langton and David Lewis have proposed an epi
 stemic humility thesis that we can only know about the causal roles of thin
 gs but not their intrinsic/fundamental properties. Langton’s framework is a
  controversial interpretation of Kant. It argues that we can only know thin
 gs though being causally affected\, but the causal properties are irreducib
 le to the intrinsic properties\, and therefore the intrinsic properties are
  unknowable. Lewis’s framework is an exploration of the Ramsey-Carnap-Lewis
  account of theoretical terms. It argues that the fundamental theoretical t
 erms in the perfect science are multiply realizable\, and therefore their r
 ealizers are unknowable. Despite their difference in background\, they both
  use arguments whose premises involve the possibility of role changing – th
 e possibility that the same intrinsic/fundamental property can realize diff
 erent causal roles in other possible worlds. I present a new model of laws 
 of nature which is different from the classical ones\, i.e. the strong law 
 model and the reductionist model. It might show that Langton’s argument mig
 ht be unsound\, and Lewis’s argument might be weakened. I will then suggest
  a new way to modify Lewis’s argument to retain its argumentative power in 
 the face of the model.\nView your event at http://www.google.com/calendar/e
 vent?action=VIEW&eid=YmdiNHRxZzJxMTh2NDltMmpwY2RpczdyODQgc3lkcGhpbEBhcnRzLn
 VzeWQuZWR1LmF1&tok=NTIjMmJlcm9za3ZqcjJnMjRyam50cWxxZWdzNm9AZ3JvdXAuY2FsZW5k
 YXIuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbTEzZjMyMzIyODQxMDcyNzQ1MTRiZWQ3NDgzYWYxYTliMjhmOTIwY2E&ctz
 =Australia/Sydney&hl=en_GB.
LAST-MODIFIED:20130611T115954Z
LOCATION:Philosophy Common Room\, Main Quad\, University of Sydney
SEQUENCE:0
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SUMMARY:USyd Postgrad Work in Progress Talk: Lok-Chi Chan
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

Attachment: invite.ics
Description: application/ics

_______________________________________________
SydPhil mailing list: http://bit.ly/sydphil

New archive: http://bit.ly/SydPhilArchive

To UNSUBSCRIBE, change your MEMBERSHIP OPTIONS, find ANSWERS TO COMMON 
PROBLEMS, or visit our ONLINE ARCHIVES, please go to the LIST INFORMATION PAGE: 
http://bit.ly/sydphil ... and if you can't get to that page, try the EMERGENCY 
PAGE: http://bit.ly/SydPhilEmergency

Reply via email to