“On Secular Neutrality: The Irony of Secular Self-Understanding” FRIDAY March 7
Philip Quadrio School of History and Philosophy University of New South Wales ACU talks are held at two locations (linked by videoconference to all ACU national campuses): North Sydney, MacKillop Level 16 TWH Building, 8-20 Napier street Strathfield, MSM VC Room (E2.45 Room) All enquiries: Steve Matthews ([email protected]) ABSTRACT This paper considers some of the metaphysical and religious presuppositions of secular political theory. It does not argue that contemporary secular views explicitly draw on religious ideas, indeed it acknowledges that secular political theory has attempted to avoid this. What it does argue is that the understanding of religion and what is proper to religious commitment found within secular political philosophy is an understanding that has itself emerged out of the Christian understanding of religion. Further that, for the most part, political philosophers do not understand this and have not taken any care to consider it. Thus because secular discourse employs concepts that are themselves religiously loaded and conceptually parochial the secular call to neutrality is, ironically, one made from a perspective whose neutrality is itself questionable. There is both a historical and a conceptual element to this problem. Historically there is a failure to understand how secular discourse itself emerges out of a theological tradition; conceptually there is a failure to appreciate the theological content of the concepts that it uses.
_______________________________________________ SydPhil mailing list: http://bit.ly/sydphil New archive: http://bit.ly/SydPhilArchive To UNSUBSCRIBE, change your MEMBERSHIP OPTIONS, find ANSWERS TO COMMON PROBLEMS, or visit our ONLINE ARCHIVES, please go to the LIST INFORMATION PAGE: http://bit.ly/sydphil ... and if you can't get to that page, try the EMERGENCY PAGE: http://bit.ly/SydPhilEmergency
