Stephan Hartmann (University of Munich): 'The No Alternatives Argument'.
Scientific theories are hard to find, and once scientists have found a theory H, they often believe that there are not many distinct alternatives to H. But is this belief justified? What should scientists believe about the number of alternatives to H, and how should they change these beliefs in the light of new evidence? These are some of the questions that we will address in this paper. We also ask under which conditions failure to find an alternative to H confirms the theory in question. This kind of reasoning (which we call the No Alternatives Argument) is frequently used in science and therefore deserves a careful philosophical analysis. When: Wednesday 19 March, 1.00pm -2.30pm Where: Muniment Room, The Quadrangle, Camperdown Campus Debbie Castle Administration Officer Unit for History and Philosophy of Science Room 441, Carslaw Building F07| THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY NSW 2006 T: + 61 2 9351 4226 E: [email protected] Office Open: Monday Tuesday and Wednesday
_______________________________________________ SydPhil mailing list: http://bit.ly/sydphil New archive: http://bit.ly/SydPhilArchive To UNSUBSCRIBE, change your MEMBERSHIP OPTIONS, find ANSWERS TO COMMON PROBLEMS, or visit our ONLINE ARCHIVES, please go to the LIST INFORMATION PAGE: http://bit.ly/sydphil ... and if you can't get to that page, try the EMERGENCY PAGE: http://bit.ly/SydPhilEmergency
