Dear all,

Just a reminder that that Professor Sara Brill (Fairfield University) will be 
presenting her paper, ‘Aristotle, Biopolitics, and the Iliad’ at the Critical 
Antiquities Workshop this week. The meeting will take place on Friday, April 9 
10-11:30am Sydney time (that’s Thursday, April 8 8-9:30pm in the eastern US). 
The abstract is posted at the end of this email.

To receive a Zoom link, please sign up for Critical Antiquities Network 
announcements here<https://signup.e2ma.net/signup/1930251/1916146>. Please 
note, if you have already subscribed to the mailing list, you will receive the 
Zoom link and need not sign up again.

Best wishes,
Tristan Bradshaw and Ben Brown

Abstract:

Aristotle’s emphasis in Politics 7 on engineering the bodily as well as 
psychical character of citizens recommends comparison with contemporary 
theories of biopolitics, a comparison Mika Ojakangas has drawn with particular 
clarity (Ojakangas 2016). To be sure, Aristotle’s eugenics legislation is 
designed to hold the generation of life under the harness of the political 
partnership. But it is far from clear that bios is the sole, or even main, 
target here and, as Brooke Holmes has pointed out (Holmes, 2019), we should 
guard against assuming too quickly the synonymy of the Greek bios and the 
prefix “bio-.” When, in the central books of the Politics, Aristotle considers 
the various forms that collectives of humans may take, he does so precisely in 
order to observe the differences both between and within kinds, and the work 
these differences do in forming communities with very particular characters. 
Aristotle’s emphasis on different kinds of human collectives connects his 
political theorizing with his zoological research, and with broader cultural 
tropes that treat vitality in close proximity to vividness. That is to say, 
while the specific legislation Aristotle designs invites comparison with 
biopolitical concerns, the end at which this legislation aims is determined 
within a conception of zōē whose political valence has not yet been fully 
charted.

This paper develops a genealogical lens for viewing Aristotle’s thinking about 
the nature of the human multitude. The examples of political animals Aristotle 
offers in the History of Animals—bees, wasps, ants, and cranes 
(1.1.487b33)—figure prominently in the Iliad’s depictions of Achaean and Trojan 
forces, who are likened to swarms and flocks and herds of all kinds. When we 
examine the imagery Homer employs to depict the actions of the collective 
Achaean and Trojan forces, we encounter an iconography of shared life that 
profoundly shaped how Aristotle thinks about the work of the polis. My primary 
claim is that Aristotle’s sense of the sharing of the perception of justice as 
the common deed that comprises human political life is informed by an Iliadic 
model, the harnessing of aisthēsis and logos alike for the pursuit of a common 
task. And, as with Aristotle, the root of this model is found in the very 
conception of living as it is accomplished by a variety of animal kinds. In 
both cases, living emerges as a collectively pursued enterprise requiring fluid 
combinations of coalescences and diffusions of force and capacity, a variety of 
“organizations” in a very particular sense. Prior to the reduction of people to 
things so powerfully observed by Simone Weil, armies have become packs and 
swarms, heroes have become walls and rivers, peoples have become sand and 
stars. I aim, then, to trace the model of political power—as the power to 
generate what Homer calls the “boundless people [dēmos apeirōn]” (24.776)—that 
emerges from out of the animal imagery for human collective action employed 
throughout the Iliad, in order to illuminate the conception of zōē that 
undergirds Aristotle’s understanding of the formation of people and that 
complicates our assessment of the “biopolitical” character of Aristotle’s 
thought.

Tristan Bradshaw
Postdoctoral Research Fellow | Co-director, Critical Antiquities Network
The University of Sydney
Department of Classics and Ancient History
School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry, Faculty of Arts and Social 
Sciences
Office: H606, Main Quadrangle | The University of Sydney | NSW | 2006
 +61 406 747 955
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>  | 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

---------
SydPhil mailing list

To unsubscribe, change your membership options, find answers to common 
problems, or visit our online archives, please go to the list information page:

https://mailman.sydney.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/sydphil

Reply via email to