Hi all

This coming wed 12 August we will hear from Daniel Muñoz (ANU)  At 3.30 is the4 
Seminar Room, N494

Title and abstract below!

Values as Vectors
Value theorists often represent an item’s value using a single precise number. 
But on this approach, no two items can be “on a par,” since parity, unlike 
equality, implies a difference in value and may persist even when one item is 
“sweetened.” To solve this problem, Derek Parfit and Ruth Chang contend that 
values must be imprecise. I argue that the appeal to imprecision is both 
inadequate and unnecessary. The fundamental problem with using numbers is not 
hyperprecision, but one-dimensionality. I illustrate this point using a model 
of values as real vectors, which are multidimensional yet fully precise. 
Peeling back the model’s assumptions, we uncover a fresh and flexible framework 
for value theory, as well as an elegant definition of parity: to be on a par is 
to be tied in value overall despite a tradeoff along underlying dimensions

---------
SydPhil mailing list

To unsubscribe, change your membership options, find answers to common 
problems, or visit our online archives, please go to the list information page:

https://mailman.sydney.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/sydphil

Reply via email to