Further to the successful International Khilafah
Conference 2007, organised by Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia
on August 12th 2007 the following is a translation
from an article that appeared in the newspaper, Kompas
Daily on 25th August:

-----------------------------------------------------


Khilafah is not romanticism

Fear of some parties that the International Khilafah
Conference would be utilized as a mean to declare the
establishment of Khilafah was unfounded since the
conference was not planned for that. The conference
was carried out simply as a medium to reinforce the
commitment to the implementation of Shari’ah and
Khilafah.

Nevertheless, the judgment of a Muslim scholar,
Azyumardi Azra, (in Kompas daily, dated August 18th )
who says that Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia grieves over the
fall of the last Uthmani Khilafah is incorrect.

As a spokesman of Hizb ut Tahrir Indonesia, I
clarified time after time that this event was not
meant to mourn and extend the sorrow of the fall of
the Uthmani Khilafah since it was inappropriate to
always mourn such a thing. Besides, Hizbut Tahrir
Indonesia has never said that the Khilafah to be
established should be like the last Uthmani Khilafah.
Rather, it aims to be similar to khilafah ‘ala minhaji
an nubuwah (Khilafah on the path of Prophethood) to
take the example of the Prophet Muhammad (saw) and
which was then continued by the Khulafaah Rashideen
(rightly-guided Khulafaah) who were the Prophet’s
prominent companions.

One important point to ponder is that the obligation
to establish Khilafah is not based on the historical
realities or empirical facts, but it is based on an
obligation, which is ordered, by Allah (swt) and
Prophet Muhammad (saw) as a way to apply Shari’ah and
to embody brotherhood.

History

However, it does not mean that the historical facts
are not important. We can take some lessons from
history in that any deviations under the Khilafah from
the guidance of the Al-Quran and the Sunnah would,
without doubt, create troubles. For that reason, the
Khilafah we seek to establish is one that is run upon
the ideal Islamic norms consistently. 

We admit that there were some divergence committed by
some of the Khulafaah, but it did not mean that it was
the Khilafah system which was wrong. It is incorrect
to blame an entire system by simply judging from the
faults of some of its rulers. 

Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia has also never stated that all
periods of the Khilafah were without blemish. There
were also some Khulafaah that turned away from the
ideal Islamic norms. However, the disappointment at
the bad attitudes of some of the Khulafaah should not
conceal the historical facts about the golden era of
Khilafah. This obviously would not be a fair
appraisal.

A number of historians have objectively documented the
golden age of the Khilafah. For example, Will Durant
in his book, The Story of Civilization, wrote that the
Khulafaah had made great efforts to give security to
the life of human beings. For centuries, they had
allowed all opportunities to be given to anyone who
needed it and ensured prosperity for all people in
vast areas, a phenomena which had never been noted
until later on.

Dr. Ali Muhammad in al-Salabi in his book al-Daulah
al-Utsmaniyah, ‘Awanul al-Nuhud wa Asbabu al-Suqut
obviously describes the roles of the Uthmani Khilafah
to resume the light of Islamic civilization which had
been built by the previous Khulafaah. So it is not an
exaggeration if Paul Kennedy in The Rise and Fall of
the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military
Conflict from 1500 to 2000 wrote about the Uthmani
Khilafah as follows: “Ottoman Empire was more than
just a military machine. It had become an elite
conqueror which was able to develop a unified faiths,
cultures and languages in greater areas than that of
Roman Empire and of greater population.”

In several centuries before 1500 AD, the Muslim world
had surpassed Europe in the fields of culture and
technology. It’s cities were great, its people were
educated, its waters were excellent. Some cities had
superb universities and complete libraries as well as
fine-looking mosques. In the fields of mathematics,
cartography, medicine, and other aspects of science
and industries, the Muslims were always in the front
line.

Islam in Indonesia

In the history of the spread of Islam in Indonesia,
the role of the Uthmani Khulafaah was remarkable. A
lot of Islamic preachers [ulema] including those of
who were called as Walis were sent by the Khaleefah.
At that time the Uthmani Khilafah took part in helping
the Sultan of Aceh to fight against the Portuguese. In
a book, Bustanus Salatin, written by Nurudin Ar
Raniri, it was mentioned that the Sultan of Aceh
received military assistance in the form of weaponry
as well as the instructors from the Khilafah. 

It is the right of Azyumardi Azra to say that the
appropriateness and viability of the ideas of Khilafah
are questionable. However, his use of the
interpretation of Surah Al Baqarah, verse 30 to reject
the system of Khilafah is also questionable.

Which prominent ulema use this verse as an excuse to
reject the system of Khilafah? Imam Al-Qurtubi in his
book of Tafseer al-Jami al-Ahkam al-Qur’an al-Azhim
(Juz 1/264) explained the verse. He wrote, “There is
no debate about the obligation (to elect a Khaleefah)
among the Muslim Ummah and the imams of the four
schools of thought…”

To unite the Muslim Ummah is a huge task, but it is
not an utopian dream. The problem lies in the
awareness. If there is awareness to correspond the
vision and mission of statehood among the Muslim Ummah
under the banner of Khilafah, such efforts to unite
them is not something impossible. This unification is
made possible due to the character of Islamic
propagation, which is aimed, at all humanity (kaffatan
li an-nash) and to give good virtues to the universe
(rahmatan lil alamin).

In the context of Indonesia, the idea of Khilafah is a
path to bring Indonesia into a better condition.
Shari’ah will substitute secularism, which is proven
to have buried this country. The idea of Khilafah is
also a form of resistance against the multi-facets of
colonialism, which grabs this country firmly in many
aspects. 

Only with a global power can the current colonialism
be matched. Therefore, this conference should be
perceived as a full attention of Hizbut Tahrir
Indonesia as well as the Muslim Ummah to the future of
Indonesia and as an effort to maintain the real
independence against all forms of existing
colonialism. 

Muhammad Ismail Yusanto
The Spokesman of Hizbut Tahrir, Indonesia

Source:
http://www.khilafah.com/kcom/the-khilafah/issues/khilafah-is-not-romanticism.html
 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play 
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/  

Kirim email ke