Sex on TV Increases Teen Pregnancy, Says Report (TIME Magazine)

By Alice Park  - Time Magazine - Monday, Nov. 03, 2008


Sex on TV has come a long way in the past few years. Anyone who saw the first 
episode of 90210— a pair of students engage in oral sex in the first episode of 
the new sequel to Beverly Hills 90210 — can attest to that. 

The question that has been debated by parents, psychologists and media critics 
for years is whether such racy content has an adverse affect on young viewers. 
Now researchers at the Rand Corporation say they have documented for the first 
time how such exposure can influence teen pregnancy rates. They found that 
teens exposed to the most sexual content on TV were twice as likely as teens 
watching less of this material to become pregnant before they reach age 20. 

"The relationship between exposure of this kind of content on TV and the risk 
of later pregnancy is fairly strong,' says Anita Chandra, a behavioral 
scientist and the study's author. "Even if it were diminished by other 
contributing factors, the association still holds.' Such consistent exposure 
may explain in part why the U.S. teen pregnancy rate is double that of other 
industrialized nations. Chandra and her team interviewed 1461 teens aged 12 to 
17 by phone, speaking to them three times between 2001 and 2004. Where previous 
studies exploring the effect of TV content on teen pregnancy relied on one-time 
snapshots of the adolescents' behavior, Chandra believes the continuity of her 
study reinforces the strength of the relationship she found between exposure to 
sexual content on television and pregnancy. 

Previous research has revealed two major ways that this glamorized perception 
of sex contributes to teen pregnancy — by encouraging teens to become sexually 
active early in their adolescence, and by promoting inconsistent use of 
contraceptives. And, notes Dr. Donald Shifrin, former chair of the American 
Academy of Pediatrics' Committee on Communications, add to this the fact that 
children are accessing television not just via the big screen at home but on 
the computer and increasingly on cell phones, and the opportunities for 
exposure to the sex-based content just explode. "It's not just appointment 
television, now it's anytime television,' says Shifrin. "And this study was 
begun seven years ago, so if it were done today, [the authors] would probably 
find more evidence of sex on screens that affects youngsters' behaviors.' 

Yet it's not likely, nor realistic, to expect the television and movie 
industries to curb the amount of sexual content in their products. That's why 
the American Academy of Pediatrics created the Media Matters campaign more than 
a decade ago, to not only promote awareness within the industry of how 
influential their TV shows and movies are to youngsters, but also to alert 
parents to the critical role they play in monitoring and mediating what their 
children watch. Having ammunition in the form of study-based association such 
as Chandra documented just gives the message more impact. 




. 
 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke