+1. The query classes rock! Personally, I'm pretty fine with code generation.. never got why that's an issue.
Daniel On Dec 5, 3:37 pm, Davert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Pablo, > > > > As I see now it's Doctrine 1 based on Doctrine 2. Well done! > > I'm working with Doctrine 1.2 for about half a year and I miss several things > that were in Propel 1.5. It's very good idea to merge the best of Doctrine 2, > Doctrine 1 and Propel 1.5 together. > > I don't know where is Propel 2 now, but it's always developed in great secret > and then.. boom! and here is a new version. > > What I like about Propel 1.5 - it's generated qureies, it's a real killing > feature that is missed even in Rails ActiveRecord. But current Propel > implementation is too much into code generation, so even behaviors are > generated. > > > > What I propose, is to look at Propel 1.5 queries code. If there is a chance > to use it for Doctrator It would be best ORM for PHP and maybe not only in > PHP. > > > > > > Thanks Jon! :) > > > > Yep Daniel, I saw the Propel2 post, but like I didn't see any code of that, I > thought could be a good idea to make Doctrator with Mondator. > > > > I'm with you with join forces, although a minimum competition is always good > to improve the projects! :) > > > > Pablo > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Richtermeister <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey Jon, > > > > yeah, probably right - and I'm not familiar with the details of each > > implementation, just hate seeing two similar efforts miss each other, > > so just pointing them out to each other. > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 12:45 pm, Jonathan Wage <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think Pablo is way further along than Propel. As far as I know Propel has > > > not done any work towards this and Pablo already has a completely working > > > implementation, and it is good. We're looking to make Doctrator the defacto > > > standard AR implementation on top of Doctrine. > > > > > > - Jon > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Richtermeister <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey Pablo, > > > > > > > while I haven't looked at your code in detail, it sounds similar to > > > > the path Propel2 decided to take.. > > > > Have you looked at this: > > > >http://propel.posterous.com/propel2-will-be-an-activerecord-implement... > > > > > > > > > Might be smartest to join forces. > > > > > > > Have a great day, > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 1:39 am, Henrik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Veeeery nice! > > > > > > > > On Nov 30, 12:05 pm, Pablo D�ez <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > Last weekend I published Doctrator, an ActiveRecord implementation (or > > > > not) > > > > > > with real and flexible behaviors for Doctrine2. > > > > > > Yep, but... what does Doctrator do really? Yesterday I published a > > > > > post > > > > > > about it also: > > > > > > > > >http://mondongo.es/blog/9/doctrator-real-and-flexible-behaviors-for-d. > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > If you are a Doctrine2 user, please tell me what you think about > > > > Doctrator > > > > > > and its way to use Doctrine2 and to build behaviors. > > > > > > > > > Doctrator comes with the following behaviors (for now): > > > > > > * Hashable > > > > > > * Ipable > > > > > > * Sluggable > > > > > > * Taggable > > > > > > * Timestampable > > > > > > * Translatable > > > > > > > > > I'm going to make the Tree and Versionable behaviors also. If you want > > > > to > > > > > > help me with them or to make more, please tell me! > > > > > > > > > By the way, Doctrator has also integration with Symfony2 with the > > > > > > DoctratorBundle. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Pablo > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > *Pablo D�ez | @pablodip* > > > > > > MondonGO Lead Developerhttp://mondongo.es > > > > > > > -- > > > > If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to > > > > security at symfony-project.com > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups "symfony developers" > > ... > > read more » -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
