Thanks for investigating, Lukas. I understand not wanting people claiming compliance when they haven't achieved it. And I agree it's a fascinating legal question whether you can actually go after someone for implementing a specification, whatever "license" you may have attached to it, unless you have patents on what the specification implements. That of course is a question for a lawyer. The license says they won't sue you over patents if you follow the license. It's not clear that anybody *has* patents on the underlying idea of validation as a reusable component, which (given its simplicity) wouldn't be patentable if the US patent system was not run by trained elephants (:
-- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
