On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:11:59 -0600, ryan weaver <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey guys- > > I'm for this as well, but it appears to me that the use of index.twig.html > would now *just* be a convention. In other words, it's incumbent on the > bundle developer to render the template as > "'FooBundle:Default:index.twig'.$this->request->getRequestFormat()". So, > the > implicit "standard" would be simply "index.twig" (which would be rendered > for all formats), though the best-practice would be "index.twig.FORMAT". > > Ryan Weaver > Lead Programmer - iostudio - Nashville, TN > http://www.iostudio.com > http://www.thatsquality.com > Twitter: @weaverryan
No, the standard will be to explicitly give the full name of the template instead of using magic to find the good template when using 'FooBundle:Default:index.twig' which is the case currently. You can use "FooBundle:Default:index.twig.html" instead of "'FooBundle:Default:index.twig'.$this->request->getRequestFormat()" if you don't need to support multiple formats in your action. -- Christophe | Stof -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
