I was against the "Bundle" prefix from the beginning for reasons of interoperability and shared this opinion on this list and on IRC. I would gladly take if i could ship my code as "Whitewashing\Blog\BlogBundle\*" as this is how it should be.
Regarding src/vendor or vendor/ i feel indifferent also, i don't think it matters much :-) greetings, Benjamin On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:28:00 +0100, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16.01.2011, at 15:04, Fabien Potencier wrote: > >> I know that it virtually breaks everything out there, but this is our >> last chance to get it right. >> >> Any thoughts? > > > I feel oddly indifferent, which is strange since I tend to be quite > opinionated most of the time :) > But I guess following the "interoperability standard" is a worthwhile > goal, even if Bundles are "just" the Symfony2 specific code, the rest > should be a library outside of the Bundle anyway. > > I do like moving from Application to App as Jordi suggested. > > I also agree with Jordi that all this overriding of Resource stuff should > boil down to just cp'ing stuff by replacing one "dir" in the original path > with another one: > cp .../XXX/.../Resources/... .../YYY/.../Resources/... > > But overall things could stay as is or they could change as you suggested, > either way I wouldn't start crying :) > > regards, > Lukas Kahwe Smith > [email protected] -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
