I agree that this could be a stated convention so that future bundles can follow it, but how to go about it? A PR to the docs?
I had the same thought: "where will SimpleDB classes go if Document is already taken by MongoDB et al?" On Tuesday, 27 March 2012 07:31:05 UTC+11, Richard Shank wrote: > > I was looking at PHPCR and noticed that we are developing a conflict for > the location of the db specific models. Right now we have CouchDocument > for CouchDB, both Document for both MongoDB and PHPCR, Entity for ORM, > Propel for Propel and typically Model for db agnostic model code, which > is often an abstract class inherited by the db specific model. > > Should we look at creating a best practice naming system? Personally, I > would like to see Model stay in the same capacity, but with the db > specific model, perhaps we should be using CouchDB, ORM, PHPCR, Propel > and MongoDB. In the future, any additional dbs that are supported, like > Amazon's SimpleDB, would go into the directory SimpleDB. > > Any thoughts on this? > > Richard > > -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
