On 4/4/12 12:53 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Aloha,
since my last mail on this topic kinda went without a reply.
can we start talking about a timeline for 2.1?
Thanks for bringing this topic on the table again. We should definitely
start working on the 2.1 plan.
1) i believe that we still need to really review all BC breaks, especially the
form related ones, and determine if they really makes sense, of they should get
a forward compat tweak to 2.0
Yes, I agree with that and I've talked with Bernhard about that. He is
going to dedicate again some time in the next coming months on Symfony
and the form/validator sub-systems specifically.
2) again from my POV composer is now in good enough shape that its not a show
stopper anymore and of course people can continue to use the old vendors script.
No question about that. Composer is now well integrated into the Symfony
Standard Edition, and as far as I can see, everything is now working fine.
3) i discussed briefly with Fabien in Denver about switching symfony/symfony to
be a collection of submodules and making the component/bridge repo's the target
for PR's. not sure if he has dropped the idea as it will make maintaining 2.0 a
serious pain, but the benefit would be that for projects just using some
components the contribution workflow would be a lot nicer
see my other email about this specific topic
4) i am unware of any major PR's that urgently need to get into 2.1 otherwise
(though of course bug fixes should always come sooner rather than later)
There are a couple of issues that needs to be resolved before a 2.1
stable. I have just created a new tag, "2.1 blocker". If you have an
issue that you think is a real blocker for 2.1, please add this tag. But
please, only use it for regressions, BC breaks that are not documented,
or BC breaks that can be easily avoided.
so imho we should start discussing 1) on the list and then schedule a meeting
for thursday next week (or whenever Bernhard and Fabien can both join) were we
can discuss anything we couldnt resolve on the list. the following week we
should then hopefully be able to publish a first RC (i dont think we need an
alpha/beta phase). we should probably aim for 2-3 RC releases with a one week
wait between, which should give us a stable release in the first half of may.
I'm available on Thursday, but one hour earlier than our regular meeting
schedule.
I agree that we won't need any beta release and we can have RCs only.
this is already much later than we all had hoped back in december so i think
its high time we get going with this release.
agreed.
Fabien
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
[email protected]
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
