I'm for a first 2.1asap without massive promotion, and a 2.2 in july/august as you think about. Lots of bundle are now mainly compatible for 2.1, as doctrine extension, and stay with 2.0 is become blocking for starting new project.
On Sunday, April 29, 2012 8:40:12 AM UTC+2, Joe Cai wrote: > > +1 for a release ASAP. Most of the time technology decisions are > simply trade-offs. In this case I think it is more important to kick > 2.1 out of door and get more community feedback. August is still > months away. There would be other PRs that want to get merged.It's not > worth delaying everything just for form/validator. After all, we all > agree that a shorter release cycle would be better. Why not do it now? > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Fabien Potencier > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The Symfony 2.1 release was expected to be published some time ago and > we > > struggle with it for two main reasons: > > > > * The number of contributions we have every single day. That's great but > it > > means that it is never a good time to release because of this last > minute > > great change that we want to merge first; > > > > * The recent BC breaks in the form/validator components. > > > > But basically, we cannot release 2.1 because of the second point. We > need to > > be sure that we only break BC for forms only once. So, we have two > options: > > > > * Wait for the form component to stabilize (which means that we are > happy > > with the state of the API and that enough people have played with it and > are > > happy with the features) > > > > * Release 2.1 as soon as possible (because we already have quite a few > nice > > enhancements). > > > > I thought that the second option was do-able by forking master and > reverting > > some PRs related to the form component (the ones that actually break BC > and > > are not stable yet because of some bugs or regressions -- surprisingly, > we > > are not talking about many of them). > > > > Many people think the contrary and so, I want to hear everybody's > opinion on > > this matter. > > > > Let me reiterate the two possibilities here: > > > > * Wait for the form component to stabilize: we can probably schedule 2.1 > for > > August 2012. In the meantime, we should concentrate on the form > component > > and delay other big changes that can affect the stability of the > release. > > > > * Release 2.1 as soon as possible. > > > > Whatever we choose, I want to next Symfony 2 releases to have shorter > > release cycles (a bit like what I do with Twig); and for that to happen, > we > > need to keep BC as much as possible so that people can upgrade to new > > versions without any fear. > > > > Fabien > > > > -- > > Fabien Potencier > > Sensio CEO - Symfony lead developer > > sensiolabs.com | symfony.com | fabien.potencier.org > > Tél: +33 1 40 99 80 80 > > > > -- > > If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it > to > > security at symfony-project.com > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "symfony developers" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en > > > > -- > Regards, > Joe > -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
