Hi Adam, There's currently a patch being worked on in the assetic repo that will solve this. The main patch is merged but there's still a number of issues that should be resolved before considering it "stable".
https://github.com/kriswallsmith/assetic/pull/297 and https://github.com/symfony/AsseticBundle/pull/119 On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Adam Monsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Assetic\Factory\AssetFactory::generateAssetName() names output files > deterministically. But why not name the output files based on the > _contents_ of the static (.js/.css) files? > > See also: > > http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/112182/how-does-se-determine-the-css-and-js-version-parameter > > And yes, I know about assets_version, but this requires something like > https://gist.github.com/3947737 to be automatic and useful. Also, it's > inefficient. It seems like a much more common reason to want to bust > cache is because some static content changed. > > -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
