Hi Lukas, everyone else!

I've not been close to the code development itself recently, but the docs
have come alive recently with more planning and pushing (more info on a
hackathon for the docs shortly). We didn't need this 6 or 12 months ago,
but enough time and development has happend that it was time for us to
refocus, revisit things that have been put away for awhile, and re-push.

The point is, if people feel that there are enough things lying around and
we need to refocus, then it makes sense. Is there a feeling this is needed
or would it be an extra layer? Is GitHub enough already? I'm not in a
position to say - but it seems worth collecting some thoughts. And not that
it's a good reason to meet, but I miss everyone :).

Of course, someone would have to wrangle this all together...

Thanks!

Ryan Weaver
US Office Head & Trainer - KnpLabs - Nashville, TN
http://www.knplabs.com <http://www.knplabs.com/en>
http://knpuniversity.com
Twitter: @weaverryan


On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Back when the release process was passed, I repeatedly mentioned that it
> would be a good idea to have 2 additional things:
> 1) a list of topics to focus on for the next release
> 2) a release manager that ensures that the list from 1) is not overlooked
> as well as ensuring that the release process is followed
>
> I still think that this would be a good addition to the release process as
> it can also help as a guidance for developers who want to contribute but
> are unsure where to best allocate their ressources. However I think that
> for our up coming 2.3 release its imperative that we at least have such a
> list I mentioned in 1).
>
> So what are the things we really want to see happening in 2.3:
> - remove all deprecated code
> - mark (all?) APIs as stable
> - update all documentation accordingly
> - .. ?
>
> From the top of my head I see a few areas, that we could add to the above
> list:
> - content negotiation support in the Routing component (
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/5711)
> - ResourceWatcher component (https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/4605)
> - core events for CLI (https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/6124)
> - HttpCache unbundling from HttpKernel and potential refactoring (see
> discussion in https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/6213 and some other
> HttpCache related PRs)
> - issues around ICU and ext/intl
> - Form layer open PRs (there are several open PRs with 50+ comments)
>
> As such I propose that we either revive the IRC meetings, try to organize
> a physical meetup of key core developers or some other way we can quickly
> identify our focus areas and a game plan how to get there.
>
> regards,
> Lukas Kahwe Smith
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on Symfony, please read the 
procedure on http://symfony.com/security

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Symfony developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to