My ideal fantasy implementation would be the caching equivalent of Monolog - a 
nice, elegant standalone project with multiple backends which goes on to help 
define the PSR (IIRC!) and is then integrated into Symfony with a 
Bridge/Bundle. Making it a core component (as in, distributed with the Standard 
Edition) could potentially wait until a PSR is finalised, but BC could also be 
maintained with a wrapper.

In the meantime, Zend Cache and Doctrine Cache are both fine and have numerous 
backends (both are missing a redis backend, but both have APC(u) and Memcached 
support).


On 3 Jun 2013, at 09:45, Matthias Noback <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Fabien,
> 
> It would be great to be able to exchange the filesystem cache used by most 
> Symfony2 caching mechanisms with something faster, by just switching a 
> configuration option.
> This probably calls for a Cache component and many modifications made to all 
> existing caching mechanisms.
> 
> When it comes to performance, I think it would be good to further analyze 
> dependencies of some many used classes (like event listeners) and make some 
> of the dependencies lazy-loading by default (using proxied services).
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Matthias
> 
> 
> Op maandag 3 juni 2013 08:52:30 UTC+2 schreef Fabien Potencier het volgende:
> Hi all, 
> 
> As Symfony 2.3 is going to be released today, that also means that work 
> on 2.4 can start now. 
> 
> We have 4 months of development, so if there is anything that you think 
> we need to work on (or things that you want to contribute to), that's 
> the right time to discuss it. Based on the topics that are the most 
> popular, we might then create dedicated teams that focus on them. 
> 
> Besides the few pull requests that already target 2.4, I have one topic 
> that I want us to work on for 2.4: **performance**. What can we do to 
> improve the performance of Symfony (on real-world apps, not for a simple 
> hello world page)? What are the main pain points? The first step would 
> be to create a suite of benchmarks for the critical components 
> (HttpFoundation, HttpKernel, Routing, EventDispatcher, ...), and then 
> see how times can be improved. 
> 
> So, if Symfony 2.4 was just about 1 new major change, which one would it 
> be for you? 
> 
> Fabien 
> 
> -- 
> Fabien Potencier 
> SensioLabs CEO - Symfony lead developer 
> sensiolabs.com | symfony.com | fabien.potencier.org 
> +33 1 40 99 80 80 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> If you want to report a vulnerability issue on Symfony, please read the 
> procedure on http://symfony.com/security
>  
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "symfony developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Symfony developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
-- 
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on Symfony, please read the 
procedure on http://symfony.com/security

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Symfony developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to