The templates can be set in yaml checkout some of the yaml examples of the builtin templates http://www.phpdoctrine.org/documentation/manual/1_0?one-page#class-templates:core-templates and you can always create your own. I personally think they are more powerful than plugins with behaviors because this is built into the orm. Symfony I believe adds the behaviors to propel, I don't think it is native, though I could be wrong on this.
Your point about most plugins needing a doctrine version is correct but some already do as in sfGuard and sfGuardDoctrine. On Jan 25, 9:42 am, "Lee Bolding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmm... that link doesn't work - infact, I can't get any of the Doctrine > documentation to work at the moment :-/ > > Is a class template as flexible as a plugin? Ie, can I apply it to any > persistable class with just a config change and a model rebuild? I don't > want to have to change code in my model objects, otherwise I'll never > upgrade my plugins because I'll have to make changes to those too. > > Lee Bolding > > w:http://www.leesbian.net > > -----Original Message----- > From: symfony-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of Michael Smith > Sent: 25 January 2008 15:27 > To: symfony users > Subject: [symfony-users] Re: Doctrine or Propel 1.3 > > Most of the ActAs plugins for propel can be done in doctrine with > class > templateshttp://www.phpdoctrine.org/documentation/manual/1_0?one-page#class-te... > without the need for a plugin. > > Thanks, > Michael > > On Jan 25, 3:32 am, "Lee Bolding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, looks like the consensus is to use Propel 1.3 > > > I think that's what I'll do for my projects that are deliverable short > term. > > For my longer term projects, I'll look at using Doctrine, which will give > > Doctrine time to become more stable whilst also allowing me time to learn > > it, and possibly to port some of the existing plugins to Doctrine > > (particularly the ActAs... plugins). > > > Thanks all :) > > > Lee Bolding > > > e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > w:http://www.leesbian.net > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: symfony-users@googlegroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Behalf Of drmikecrowe > > Sent: 25 January 2008 03:32 > > To: symfony users > > Subject: [symfony-users] Re: Doctrine or Propel 1.3 > > > Agreed. I crashed and burned with Doctrine, but Propel 1.3 has been > > rock solid. That's with experience in using Doctrine stand-alone in > > other applications. > > > We must fully support both. > > > On Jan 24, 4:55 pm, Nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One more vote for Propel 1.3 - I did many inheritance tests with > > > sfDoctrine and got stuck in a few places with complex relationships. > > > It's soooo close, but with the timing on my project we can't wait or > > > spend extra time debugging. I'm currently using a class key column in > > > Propel and it's been solid and fast... > > > > Nate --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
