Their is no standard rule. It is basically up to the developer :) I think it would be worth enforcing a naming pattern for plugins so that we can have proper naming for multiple versions of plugins which depend on multiple versions of symfony.
- Jon On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Jay Klehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How are other plugins dealing with Symfony 1.1? (naming of branches and > the sort) > > Jay > > Jonathan Wage wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I will be doing some work on the sfDoctrinePlugin for a new version. > > This will require that we make some changes to the way things are > > organized in svn. I am going to propose a structure for the branches > > and tags. > > > > Currently we have sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/0.1 and > > sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.0, below is an explanation of what each is > > currently, and what I want to change it to. > > > > sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/0.1 - The very first version of the > > sfDoctrinePlugin, which is linked to a super outdated version of > > Doctrine. This branch likely doesn't even work anymore. I would > > recommend removing it completely? > > > > sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.0 - The current stable sfDoctrinePlugin > > 1.0 that is compatible with symfony 1.0 > > > > sfDoctrinePlugin/trunk - The current stable sfDoctrinePlugin 1.0 that > > is compatiable with symfony 1.1 > > > > I want to propose a new structure. > > > > Rename sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/0.1 to > > sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/0.1-sf1.0 > > Rename sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.0 to > > sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.0-sf1.0 > > Branch sfDoctrinePlugin/trunk to sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.0-sf1.1(I > > have already done this) > > > > Continue development of new version of sfDoctrinePlugin-1.1 compatible > > with symfony 1.1 in trunk and when it is done: > > > > Branch sfDoctrinePlugin/trunk to sfDoctrinePlugin/branches/1.1-sf1.1 > > > > The naming pattern is "Plugin.Version-sfDependency-Version". Tags > > would be pretty much the same except with point releases on the > > version numbers, i.e. sfDoctrinePlugin/tags/1.1.2-sf1.1, > > sfDoctrinePlugin/tags/1.0.2-sf1.1, etc. > > > > I think having this pattern for all plugins would be a good thing. > > Thoughts? > > > > Thanks, Jon > > > > -- > > Jonathan Wage > > http://www.jwage.com > > http://www.centresource.com > > > > > > > > -- Jonathan Wage http://www.jwage.com http://www.centresource.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
