...and some developers don't like php in HTML tags ie.
messy:
<img src="/images/myimage.gif" class="<?= $class ?>" />
neat... being php only (matter of preference really):
<?= image_tag("myimage.gif","class=$class"); ?>
2008/4/30 Tom Haskins-Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I like the neatness of it. Especially when combined with a link_to tag.
> I'd rather not put html into a link_to so this helps me here.
>
> Another reason, I guess, is that you could move the image folder - for
> whatever reason - and then just change the config rather than going
> through all your img tags and doing it by hand/script.
>
> Other than that, I can't think.
>
> Richtermeister wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My HTML guys brought up the question what is really gained by using
> > the "image_tag" function instead of just using an img tag, especially
> > since the former adds processing time (albeit near zero)...
> >
> > I've been comfortable using the tag function, but now I'm double
> > guessing myself..
> > Any takes?
> >
> > Daniel
> > >
> >
>
> >
>
--
Charles Hilditch
Web Developer
Mob: 0415 166 137
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crh-systems.com/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"symfony users" group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
