Hey Dennis, thanks for confirming. I thought about "uncategorized" as well, but I don't know what the ratio of categorized vs. categorized items will be (system is for a client), so I don't want users to have to type uncategorized into every url... I ended up using 2 routes for now.
Thanks again, Daniel On Aug 25, 10:51 pm, Dennis Benkert <spinecras...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > afaik you can't do this using one route. But without knowing more about > your project, how about using a category called 'uncategorized' which > will be the default one if non is chosen? This way you can use one route > and urls would be like > > /library/legal/document2.pdf > > and if no category was chosen > > /library/uncategorized/document.pdf > > - Dennis > > Richtermeister wrote: > > Hi all, > > > quick question. I'm trying to accommodate a url with an optional > > category. > > > Say you have documents that can be categorized, like: "/library/legal/ > > document1.pdf", where "legal" is a category. > > > Now, for uncategorized documents, I would like those to omit the > > category parameter, like so: > > > "/library/document2.pdf" > > > is this possible with one routing class definition? Looking to do with > > with a propel route. > > > Thanks, and have a great day. > > Daniel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
