http://www.doctrine-project.org/documentation/manual/1_1/en/inheritance#simple
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:04, tirengarfio <tirengar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What do you mean with "Doctrine "simple inheritance""?? > > > On Oct 8, 9:50 pm, Tom Boutell <t...@punkave.com> wrote: >> You'd have to change the schema.yml of the plugin. >> >> But instead of doing that, you can use Doctrine "simple inheritance" >> to add the fields to that table. >> >> Simple inheritance is a lot less of a pain than using profiles and I >> recommend it. it's a shame that the sfDoctrineGuardPlugin manual >> doesn't steer users in that direction instead of just reiterating the >> Symfony 1.0/Propel style recommendation to use a separate profile >> table. >> >> On Oct 8, 9:32 am, tirengarfio <tirengar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > I have read an article (link below) about adding profiles to the users >> > that are generated after building the sfDoctrineGuardPlugin models >> > that are defined in its schema.yml. >> >> >http://www.symfony-project.org/blog/2008/11/12/call-the-expert-custom... >> >> > It says that if you want to add a profile to the users you should add >> > a new model in schema.yml called for example "Profile" and that must >> > be related to sfGuardUser model. >> >> > My question: Is there anything that advise against adding the profile >> > fields in the sfGuardUser directly instead of define the model >> > "Profile"? >> >> > Ciao >> >> > Javi > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
