So guys wassup, here is the thing, I have a db on localhost and the website server. ON the localhost, the DB is only an instance of the real big db that exists at the server. That is, it only has 4 tables of say a DB of 16 tables, because the website requires only 4 of those tables, and shares it's DB with an MMORPG.
Now, when I need to updates and changes on the localhost DB, I do not make use of propel migrations, but instead follow a reverse engineering technique, where I make change physically to the db table UI, then build the schema and the corresponding models. This step clearly evades the build-sql and insert-sql steps, hence the DB is not generated through and via symfony. There was a discussion on this earlier, the subject : TIP:FOR UPGRADING DATABASES WITHOUT MIGRATING Now, I need to get the changes on the website. Here is what I am planning to do. Simply, update the schema file, the entire lib folder(models, om's etc etc), and offcourse the changes incorporated in the modules. What I wanna know is, given the approach I have taken to make changes to the DB table and to the various files, is this possible? Is there something amiss? I can't afford to loose data on the main DB, hence I have stayed away from em migrations, coz I don't know how to use them either ways. Thanks and regards, Parijat Kalia -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to symfony-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
