Comment #57 on issue 1695 by asmeurer: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1695
>>> Maybe there are better alternatives, but could not find >>> one yet. Any suggestions are welcome. Maybe this betrays my misunderstanding of the new assumptions system, but can't you implement it there. i.e., we need to implement relational logic there anyway (see issue 398 and issue 1047). From what I know (which could be totally wrong), you implement basic facts and then the satisfiability code try to determine the logic behind it (if it is always true, never true, etc.). Or am I completely wrong? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
