Comment #4 on issue 1770 by smichr: runtests could be more conservative in printing http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1770
Vinzent wrote:>>> Thanks, looks fine now. Only the 'if not funcs: return' line seems pointless to me, as it does not work apparently. Do you think this should still go in before the release? <<< I think so...but I'm biased. There's a much cleaner output now, and the "if not funcs line works" here...it's in the doctest portion of the code...are you judging it based on the output of tests? Also note that if there are tests that were run then there will be output. Only if there aren't tests will there not be a file name output. Right now I only have 76 *py files tested and 16 *txt files that show up as having tests. The power went out here just before I did an updating push...I can't remember what was pending at that time, but I just pushed a version that should be working. Please review again. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
