Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #18 on issue 1766 by asmeurer: expand(power_base=True) is too
aggressive
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766
Regarding the changes to test_nth_linear_constant_coeff_homogeneous, what
caused the change, for example, from Eq(f(x), C1*exp(-
x + x*sqrt(2)) + C2*exp(-x - x*sqrt(2))) to Eq(f(x),
C1*exp(-x)*exp(x*sqrt(2)) + C2*exp(-x)*exp(-x*sqrt(2)))? I like the first
better
because it's consistent with solutions to that type of equation matching
exp(a*x). It shouldn't be too hard to call powsimp in the
relevant part of odesimp.
Also, could you make it clear which commits are for review and which are
WIP/for review for other issues. Unless these commits
depend on each other (which you should indicate with blocked on), I think
git cherry-pick is your friend here (i.e., make separate
branches).
I haven't looked at the other parts yet.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
