Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview NeedsBetterPatch
Comment #7 on issue 1770 by asmeurer: runtests could be more conservative
in printing
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1770
This prints a bit more of the path than the regular doctests:
sympy/utilities/iterables.py[9] .........
[OK]
sympy/utilities/lambdify.py[2] ..
[OK]
sympy/utilities/source.py[1] .
[OK]
================= tests finished: 328 passed in 50.89 seconds
==================
============================== txt doctests start
==============================
sympy/sympy/doc/src/gotchas.txt [104]
[OK]
sympy/sympy/doc/src/modules/assumptions.txt [80]
[OK]
sympy/sympy/doc/src/modules/concrete.txt [22]
[OK]
Note that my full path is
/Users/aaronmeurer/Documents/python/sympy/sympy/doc/.
As far as the .txt tests, they could still use some improvement. They do
not print the dots "." like the other tests, and
the line of the file being tested is not printed until after the file is
testes, which can cause confusion when a test runs
slow. On the other hand, the verbose mode there is much more useful than
the stupid regular doctest verbose mode,
which simply replaces the dot "." with "ok" as far as I can tell. But this
does not hinder the present change.
This isn't all too important, so if you can fix it, great, otherwise, it
can still go in (hence both tags). I'm going to hold off
pushing anything until I look at the whole branch anyway.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
