Comment #33 on issue 1766 by Vinzent.Steinberg: expand(power_base=True) is
too aggressive
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766
About private stuff in namespace: I would just document it (docstrings),
and don't
make it private if it could be useful to others. If you are not sure, I
would not add
it to the default imports in __init__.py.
About your little friends: Just document them (also the motivation), it's a
nice
addition. In a later patch we could even move them and make them more
general, could
be useful in other places.
About 'content': Are you sure it's worth the duplication? Why? Convenience?
Speed?
About 'cls(0.9)': Commit 07150179a2a4bf82d448b4f2988f4471951f9ac3 in
test_numbers.py.
I still get one failing test, possibly platform dependent:
______________ sympy/solvers/tests/test_solvers.py:test_tsolve_1
_______________
File "/home/one/src/sympy/sympy/solvers/tests/test_solvers.py", line 234,
in
test_tsolve_1
[-((4*log(7) +
5*LambertW(-7*2**Rational(4,5)*6**Rational(1,5)*log(7)/10))/(3*log(7)))]]
AssertionError
I'm getting: [-(4*log(7) + 5*LambertW(-7*3**(1/5)*log(7)/5))/(3*log(7))]
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
