Comment #50 on issue 1766 by smichr: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766
sy...@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #49 on issue 1766 by Vinzent.Steinberg: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766
Here is a patch that fixes the test for real. (I don't know why the comparison fails, but this patch works and should be a more elegant solution.)
Fails for me here so I counter propose another solution relying on deep powsimp to make the two the same. It's unsquashed but near the original patch--look for "s
tsolve" (s for "it will be squashed") /c -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
