Comment #4 on issue 2531 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Sympy objects for Boolean values: True, False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2531
I didn't really get that from that discussion, but it's fine with me nonetheless, if only because we don't really need a "None" yet. I guess we'll have to see how things play out with the new assumptions. I'm still a little confused about what can and/or should be using three-valued logic.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1009 is also relevant here. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-issues" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues?hl=en.
