Comment #1 on issue 3901 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Improve integration of li(z)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3901
I think dealing with integrands containing li is much simpler than dealing
with ones that would produce li (the same with erf, or other functions
defined by nonelementary integrals). In fact, the algorithms that are there
may already be able to do it, but just not with enough rigor to determine
if a nonresult means it is nonelementary (in the li extension).
We really ought to just rewrite risch to deal with nontranscendental
extensions. I think the only difference is that we cannot assert
nonelementaryness in that case, but it is not a big deal (vs. getting many
more integrals for free). One does need to verify the theory to be sure of
this, I think it is the case.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
