On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:01:09PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Andy R. Terrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Okay I applied all your comments and updated my repo > > http://bitbucket.org/aterrel/sympy-aterrel/ > > Thanks, all patches are in. Btw, I noticed you had to merge your > patches with the ones I rebased --- so in the end it's very confusing > in the history, that there are the patches twice. So I think I should > have just merged and committed your patches without rebasing. Andy and > Kirill and others, what do you think?
I think sympy should migrate to git asap, and also everyone should really learn how to - git rebase (optionally -i) - git commit --amend I think there is no reason sympy should have hairy history, and also there is no reason why review corrections are implemented as separate commits. Just my imho, -- Kirill --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---