On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:01:09PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Andy R. Terrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Okay I applied all your comments and updated my repo
> > http://bitbucket.org/aterrel/sympy-aterrel/
>
> Thanks, all patches are in. Btw, I noticed you had to merge your
> patches with the ones I rebased --- so in the end it's very confusing
> in the history, that there are the patches twice. So I think I should
> have just merged and committed your patches without rebasing. Andy and
> Kirill and others, what do you think?
I think sympy should migrate to git asap, and also everyone should
really learn how to
- git rebase (optionally -i)
- git commit --amend
I think there is no reason sympy should have hairy history, and also
there is no reason why review corrections are implemented as separate
commits.
Just my imho,
--
Kirill
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
