On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Lance Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I think it worth sending to the main mailing list one way or another. >> There has been a lot of discussion on the sympy-patches list which >> probably doesn't have the visibility of the sympy list. I think the >> problems with the different approaches have been covered here, so it >> is worth hearing what other developers or users of sympy think. I am >> still OK with the original idea of using parameters as strings. I like >> the convenience of using f(x=1) to evaluate an expression. I believe >> that reasonable documentation would help alleviate some of the >> confusion. I don't have experience with using the kind of hack >> suggested by Riccardo, so I don't know the pitfalls, but it was a >> pretty cool way to get around the problem raise by Riccardo. However, >> it is probably a good idea to get a better picture of what a more >> general audience thinks about how to handle this. > > Ok, let's bring it to the main list. I'll try to do it in the afternoon.
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/browse_thread/thread/3a8e1321ee1c4bd8 Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
