Looks good.

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Øyvind Jensen <jensen.oyv...@gmail.com>wrote:

> ---
>  sympy/physics/secondquant.py |   25 +++++++++++++------------
>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sympy/physics/secondquant.py b/sympy/physics/secondquant.py
> index edc9987..687bf9d 100644
> --- a/sympy/physics/secondquant.py
> +++ b/sympy/physics/secondquant.py
> @@ -2325,10 +2325,15 @@ def evaluate_deltas(e):
>     imply a loss of information, nothing is done.
>
>     In case an index appears in more than one KroneckerDelta, the resulting
> -    final substitution depends on the larger expression.  Behavior of
> -    evaluate_deltas is in that case undefined.
> +    substitution depends on the order of the factors.  Since the ordering
> is platform
> +    dependent, the literal expression resulting from this function may be
> hard to
> +    predict.
> +
> +    Examples:
> +    =========
> +
> +    We assume that
>
> -    Examples:  We assume that
>     >>> from sympy import symbols, Function
>     >>> from sympy.physics.secondquant import evaluate_deltas,
> KroneckerDelta
>     >>> i,j = symbols('ij',below_fermi=True, dummy=True)
> @@ -2338,9 +2343,9 @@ def evaluate_deltas(e):
>     >>> t = Function('t')
>
>     The order of preference for these indices according to KroneckerDelta
> is
> -    (a,b,i,j,p,q)  So we get
> +    (a,b,i,j,p,q).
>
> -    ==Trivial cases===
> +    Trivial cases:
>
>     >>> evaluate_deltas(KroneckerDelta(i,j)*f(i))       # d_ij f(i) -> f(j)
>     f(_j)
> @@ -2353,8 +2358,7 @@ def evaluate_deltas(e):
>     >>> evaluate_deltas(KroneckerDelta(q,p)*f(q))       # d_qp f(q) -> f(p)
>     f(_p)
>
> -
> -    ==more interesting cases===
> +    More interesting cases:
>
>     >>> evaluate_deltas(KroneckerDelta(i,p)*t(a,i)*f(p,q))
>     f(_i, _q)*t(_a, _i)
> @@ -2363,16 +2367,13 @@ def evaluate_deltas(e):
>     >>> evaluate_deltas(KroneckerDelta(p,q)*f(p,q))
>     f(_p, _p)
>
> -
> -    == Do nothing to prevent loss of information ===
> +    Finally, here are some cases where nothing is done, because that would
> +    imply a loss of information:
>
>     >>> evaluate_deltas(KroneckerDelta(i,p)*f(q))
>     KroneckerDelta(_i, _p)*f(_q)
> -
>     >>> evaluate_deltas(KroneckerDelta(i,p)*f(i))
>     KroneckerDelta(_i, _p)*f(_i)
> -
> -
>     """
>
>
> --
> 1.6.5
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy-patches" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sympy-patc...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<sympy-patches%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-patc...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en.

Reply via email to