It did. The branch was the combination of the two patches that made it to this list with git-email, plus an extra test case that you had suggested.
Cheers On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Vinzent Steinberg < vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2010/3/25 Christian Muise <christian.mu...@gmail.com> > > Yeah, I also prefer branches, it's trivial to push and pull. The patch >>> is +1 from me, I pushed it in. Thanks! >> >> >> Woot! Thanks guys. >> >> I had a number of git questions, but all has been cleared up via IRC. >> Next patch will be much smoother. >> >> Cheers >> > > Did this also include your previous patch? > > Vinzent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy-patches" group. > To post to this group, send email to sympy-patc...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<sympy-patches%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-patc...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en.
