On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Fredrik Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why does it make sense to cover all equalities and inequalities by > this one operator Eq? The present syntax is to me like spelling x*y+z > as Add(Add(x,'*',y), '+', z) Doesn't it make more sense to define > separate Eq, Ne, Lt, Le, Gt, Ge operators?
That's right. I was mainly concentrating on the == case. I think "Eq, Ne, Lt, Le, Gt, Ge" is even better solution. Plus I think it's also useful to have something like Op(a, b, "<="), so that one can quickly change this from <= to < or > etc., without having to think if > is Lt, or Le, etc. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
