On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Riccardo Gori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 29 June 2008 14:16:24 Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>> Ok, after a bit of thinking, and good idea from Fredrik about
>> "appropriate context" in repr description, here is what I propose:
>>
>> pprint(expr) -- nice looking 2D pretty-printed formula
>>
>> str(expr)    -- if possible nice loocking 1D formula, and
>>
>>                 sympify(str(expr)) == expr      invariant holds
>>
>>
>> repr(expr)   -- internal representation of expr with class names and
>>                 other details, and
>>
>>                 eval(repr(expr))   == expr      invariant holds
>>
>>
>> Sounds reasonable?
>
> I agree 100%

Great. If you'd like to give it a shot, go ahead. This thread should
give enough information how to do it, if not, just ask.

Ondrej

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to