On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 21:33, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
> So I think it's a bug. Thanks a lot for reporting it. The problem is > with this code: > > if not (cond_type is bool or issubclass(cond_type, Relational) or \ > issubclass(cond_type, Number)): > raise TypeError, \ > "Cond %s is of type %s, but must be a bool," \ > " Relational or Number" % (ec[1], cond_type) > > > It checks for bool, but not numpy.bool_. Does anyone know how to make > it, so that it works with numpy types, but doesn't use numpy.bool_ > explicitely? Do you *need* to typecheck? If so, then try this out: http://www.enthought.com/~rkern/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/deferredisinstance -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
