Ok, I see that the Basic/Expr split has been merged, so I will work on
this stuff next week.

Cheers,

Brian

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Brian Granger <ellisonbg....@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Ronan,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, for my students it doesn't matter, but for us devs it does.  I
>>>> just left a comment on your branch.  I do agree that your branch
>>>> should go in before adding any new methods to Basic.
>>>
>>> For the record, it's this issue:
>>>
>>> http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1798
>>>
>>> and this branch:
>>>
>>> http://github.com/rlamy/sympy/tree/split_Basic
>>>
>>> I apologize for not looking at this in details so far. I also didn't
>>> like the idea initially, but it seems it's a good idea and if
>>> everybody agrees to have this in, let's do that. I am busy today, but
>>> will have some time in the evening to review it properly. If it
>>> simplifies the core, then let's do that.
>>
>> I have played with this split_Basic branch and all tests pass. It will
>> have to be rebased on top of our latest master, but that shouldn't be
>> a big problem.
>>
>> Ronan --- I saw that your split_Basic_pc2 branch seems a bit more
>> polished, so I also tested that, all tests pass. Which one should we
>> use?
>>
>> So in general I am ok with this. But I still don't understand exactly
>> what should be in Expr and what in Basic.
>>
>> I see that all arithmetic methods are in Expr, as well as series() and
>> related methods. subs(), match() are still in Basic. This should be
>> explained in the docstring of Expr, how to decide what should go into
>> Expr and what into Basic.
>>
>> After this is clarified, let's get it in, I can help with that. Brian
>> can then implement the rest of the methods in Expr.
>
> Ah, got it, the branch is actually Basic-split-rebased-2 and it is +1
> from me, as well as Vinzent, so I have pushed this in.
>
> Nevertheless, a way better docstring for the Expr class, together with
> motivation is still missing, can you please fix that?
>
> Ondrej
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to