On 28 avr, 02:59, Ronan Lamy <ronan.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > This issue has been raised many times and I think nobody likes the > current situation. However, the current behaviour is quite convenient > when it works, and much code depends on it. I think that the best > solution is to distinguish structural matching (like Mathematica) from > algebraic matching (like the current implementation of subs) and to have > separate functions/methods for each.
I also think we should have the two ways of matching. Vinzent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
