On Apr 28, 5:09 pm, "Aaron S. Meurer" <asmeu...@gmail.com> wrote: > These are probably good ideas, though I am not to familiar with the code. > Where does splitting subs into an algebraic subs and a strictly structural > subs fit into all of this?
As I said above, it's my intend to replace the matching algorithm implemented by "subs" (more precisely by "_eval_subs") with the matching algorithm implemented by "match". In the moment these are basically two different implementations which behave slightly different and make it hard to predict the outcome. A separate issue is that I would like to also have structural matching which isn't implemented in the moment. If I or someone else succeeds in implementing this then subs could easily be adapted to use it by making it accept some keyword like "matchmethod" which then would propagate to the used match function. I hope this answers your question, Sebastian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
