Alternatively we may leave sympify untouched and use 'simple()' instead of 'simplify()'. I write this function quite often and every byte counts. Filip
On 6 pro, 22:05, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:29 AM, smichr <smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The similarity between "simpify" and "simplify" is misleading. > > > Yes, that would be...but it's SYMpify not SIMpify. But yes, they are > > close. I (as has been pointed out) almost exclusively use S() and so > > it's not a problem. Would there be any reason not to delete sympify > > from the namespace and just provide S() as the standard conversion > > call name? > > It seems like a good plan if everybody agrees. I believe S is some > other global object, so it should be renamed and S should be a > function. sympify() should return a deprecated warning for some time, > before we remove it. > > Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
