On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 13:50, Brian Granger <elliso...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ondrej,
>> However, allowing people to create packages and host it under the >> sympy github organization is a great idea, that is for sure. To have a >> well defined one module for one thing, e.g. let's say the quantum >> stuff. E.g. not Ondrej's quantum, Brian's quantum, but SymPy's >> quantum, part of the SymPy community. For now, I would keep it as part >> of the sympy repository, it makes things easier, but later on, yes, we >> can definitely split it. > > This sounds like a great plan. I will play around with pkgutils to > see if we can do this without using setuptools. I'm not sure he is suggesting that they be part of a sympy namespace package, just that their github repositories can be hosted under the sympy github organization. After pushing for scikits, I think umbrella namespace packages (distinct from organization-owned namespace packages like enthought) are more trouble than they're worth, whether implemented with setuptools or pkgutils. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
