Is this code at a pull request?

Aaron Meurer

On Mar 28, 2011, at 2:23 AM, Saptarshi Mandal wrote:

> Tests work now. I commented out a few because of some really strange
> issues. One involved integrating a function defined as 0.5*x*y wrt y,
> this gave an error saying it expected an integer and instead got
> 0.50000000 or something like that.
> 
> The other involves how i deal with equalities. Most of the ide solving
> techniques requires me to "grow" expressions and so I normally start
> out by defining an equality like
> neweq = Eq(0,0) and then adding terms to the lhs
> I dont know if its idiomatic, or even the right way to do it, but it
> worked fine until I got the tests to work. This has broken the series
> method.
> 
> I have stopped work on the laplace transform for now and intend to get
> some basic functionality of combinatorica running on sympy as a POC
> for my soc project.
> 
> On Mar 20, 7:07 am, "Aaron S. Meurer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mar 19, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Saptarshi Mandal wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> I have finally figured out exactly what was going wrong with the
>>> failing tests. For those not in the loop, the problem went something
>>> like this. I was importing Integral using
>> 
>>>>> from sympy import Integral
>> 
>>> When I would try to run the tests it would show an error saying there
>>> is an import error, specifically with the line where I am making that
>>> import. Strangely, there is a class called C which I can import and
>>> use the Integral as C.Integral(...) and everything seems to work fine.
>> 
>> Yes, this is the purpose of the C class.  Sometimes it is impossible to 
>> import something directly because of circular imports, so we have the C 
>> class to get around it.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> As I am fairly new to Python and Sympy I do not know if this is a
>>> quirk or what.
>> 
>>> Also regarding Gsoc I was interested in implementing a subset of
>>> Combinatorica, say, the most important functions in the subsets,
>>> permutations, group theory and graph visualization and drawing.
>>> I can implement a sizable amount of these algorithms as I have
>>> exposure to functional programming and I think I can use the
>>> functional constructs of Python to do the job.
>>> Alternatively, I found the Karr summation problem to be interesting as
>>> well but I will need to do a lot of research before I can commit any
>>> code in.
>> 
>> I would recommend doing the combinatorica project.  The Karr algorithm is 
>> very difficult.  
>> 
>> Also, you need to finish up the review of your integral equations module so 
>> that it gets pushed in.  Otherwise, you will not be eligible.  
>> 
>> Aaron Meurer
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> I will be away on a vacation for 6 days so I will not be around to
>>> respond immediately but I will try.
>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Saptarshi Mandal
>> 
>>> On Feb 28, 10:08 pm, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Go ahead and update the pull request for this, or create a new one.
>> 
>>>> Also, another comment is that you have a lot of trailing whitespace in
>>>> your files (don't forget to run the tests before commiting).
>> 
>>>> Aaron Meurer
>> 
>>>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Vinzent Steinberg
>> 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> On 27 Feb., 22:26, Saptarshi Mandal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> I was busy with exams so I couldn't do much the last 2 weeks. Today I
>>>>>> finished with the
>>>>>> Neumann Series implementation and will start on a Laplace/Fourier
>>>>>> transform module next week.
>>>>>> This will be used to implement one of the few techniques that give
>>>>>> closed form solutions for integral
>>>>>> equations. It can also be used to solve certain boundary value
>>>>>> problems.
>>>>>> Please feel free to give any suggestions or design tips.
>> 
>>>>> For reference, here is a link to Saptarshi's branch on github (please
>>>>> correct me if it is the wrong one):
>> 
>>>>> https://github.com/saptman/sympy/tree/dev_ide
>> 
>>>>> Aaron already commented some of your work btw.
>> 
>>>>> Vinzent
>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "sympy" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "sympy" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to