On 27 Mai, 08:43, Chris Smith <smi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that with igcd, ilcm, igcdex, ifib, and ifac there is precedence for
> using these simple names.

This is a good point. However the less verbose names are cryptic to
me, whereas the current ones are easy to understand intuitively. What
about having both names?

Vinzent

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to